Write-In Test: Adjudicated UWI

Thursday, April 2, 2026

Demonstration: how adjudicating write-ins separately can create different results (or, in general, how batch elimination can affect the outcome when the strict batch rules aren't followed). In this example, write-ins are adjudicated. | Download Raw Summary Data
Round Eliminated Winners
Round 1
Round 2 UWI 2: C->A->B
Round 3 Option B (next: A, C)
Round 4 UWI 1: B->C->A Option C (next: B, A)

Round 1

Candidate What changed Current total votes
Option C (next: B, A) 52 votes in the first round 20.39%
52 votes
Option A (next: C, B) 52 votes in the first round 20.39%
52 votes
UWI 1: B->C->A 55 votes in the first round 21.57%
55 votes
Option B (next: A, C) 51 votes in the first round 20.0%
51 votes
UWI 2: C->A->B 45 votes in the first round 17.65%
45 votes

Round 2

Candidate What changed Current total votes
Option C (next: B, A) Gained 45 votes 38.04%
97 votes
Option A (next: C, B) 20.39%
52 votes
UWI 1: B->C->A 21.57%
55 votes
Option B (next: A, C) 20.0%
51 votes
UWI 2: C->A->B Eliminated: 45 votes redistributed to remaining candidates or became inactive

Round 3

Candidate What changed Current total votes
Option C (next: B, A) 38.04%
97 votes
Option A (next: C, B) Gained 51 votes 40.39%
103 votes
UWI 1: B->C->A 21.57%
55 votes
Option B (next: A, C) Eliminated: 51 votes redistributed to remaining candidates or became inactive

Round 4

Candidate What changed Current total votes
Option C (next: B, A) Elected: Gained 55 votes 59.61%
152 votes
Option A (next: C, B) 40.39%
103 votes
UWI 1: B->C->A Eliminated: 55 votes redistributed to remaining candidates or became inactive

Option C (next: B, A)

Round What changed Current total votes
Round 1 52.0 first-round votes. 20.39%
52 votes
Round 2 Gained 45 votes from UWI 2: C->A->B. 38.04%
97 votes
Round 3 38.04%
97 votes
Round 4 Elected. Gained 55 votes from UWI 1: B->C->A. 59.61%
152 votes

Option A (next: C, B)

Round What changed Current total votes
Round 1 52.0 first-round votes. 20.39%
52 votes
Round 2 20.39%
52 votes
Round 3 Gained 51 votes from Option B (next: A, C). 40.39%
103 votes
Round 4 40.39%
103 votes

UWI 1: B->C->A

Round What changed Current total votes
Round 1 55.0 first-round votes. 21.57%
55 votes
Round 2 21.57%
55 votes
Round 3 Eliminated. 21.57%
55 votes

Option B (next: A, C)

Round What changed Current total votes
Round 1 51.0 first-round votes. 20.0%
51 votes
Round 2 Eliminated. 20.0%
51 votes

UWI 2: C->A->B

Round What changed Current total votes
Round 1 45.0 first-round votes. Eliminated. 17.65%
45 votes
Candidate name Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4
Option C (next: B, A)

20.39%

52 votes

38.04%

97 votes

38.04%

97 votes

59.61%

152 votes
Option A (next: C, B)

20.39%

52 votes

20.39%

52 votes

40.39%

103 votes

40.39%

103 votes
UWI 1: B->C->A

21.57%

55 votes

21.57%

55 votes

21.57%

55 votes
Option B (next: A, C)

20.0%

51 votes

20.0%

51 votes
UWI 2: C->A->B

17.65%

45 votes


This changes the longform description FAQs to describe Preferential Block Voting

Presents the Single Table Summary in a format readable by Wikipedia
Uses an iframe to embed the interactive Bar Chart
On sites that support embed.ly (including Medium, Wordpress, Canva, and more), you can just paste this URL
Showing interactive content. Show print-friendly instead? Showing print-friendly content. Show interactive instead?